Classrooms have never been the place for guns, nor should they ever be. One of the major cons is that universities would have to put out millions of dollars to accommodate those who chose to carry concealed hand guns on campus.
When I was in my second year of graduate school, attending classes and teaching quite literally in the shadow of the tower that Whitman had fired from, Texas Monthly published an excellent reflection on the event to mark its 40th anniversary.
Notably, they used long rifles, not the handguns that many citizens carry today in legal concealment. They were not firing with sidearms at close quarters but with more accurate weapons over greater distances.
And they were firing like crazy back at the Tower.
There was massive testosterone. Eventually Whitman was killed by police officers who stormed his position. In those, assailants frequently appear to move from position to position and to not always choose those that offer the physical protection Whitman fired from.
Had Whitman been moving about, he would have been more exposed, but the confusion of those firing back would also have been greater -- as would their chances of hitting an innocent bystander. Now Texas, both the state and its public university system, finds itself at the fore of how to move forward within a society in which campus shootings are no longer novel but assumed to be nearly inevitable.
Recently passed legislation has made it legal for students, staff and faculty to carry concealed weapons, but the law has left large portions of its implementation up to individual campuses.
Only private colleges and universities in the state can opt out entirely from allowing concealed weapons on their campuses, and virtually all of them have, including conservatively aligned Baylor University.
University of Texas System Chancellor William McRaven, a retired admiral and no stranger to the violence weapons are capable of, opposed the legislation.
They also are entirely unconvinced, as law enforcement professionals, that concealed weapons would make college campuses safer. The Texas legislation has not taken full effect yet, but in terms of employment, UT Austin is already beginning to feel its effects.
A prominent dean cited the legislation as a factor in his recent decision to leave the university, while another candidate for a deanship withdrew from a job searchciting the legislation as his singular reason for doing so.
Recently, a University of Houston presentation slide regarding the new Texas campus-carry legislation went viral, primarily because it made explicit the chilling effect that many educators anticipate guns will have on classroom discussions and university life. The backlash I experienced from pro-gun individuals and groups was striking, widespread and bordering on libelous.
I remain, despite owning guns and understanding them well, strongly opposed to allowing students, faculty and staff to carry weapons on college campuses. I will readily concede and agree that the vast, vast, vast majority of concealed-carry permit holders are law-abiding citizens.
And because they have gone through the proper processes to obtain permits, they are likely to be more law-abiding than citizens who own guns but have not obtained similar permits.
I also am not really concerned that the average concealed permit holder would ever intentionally threaten me or another member of my campus community.
Thousands of permit holders walk around daily, experiencing the routine frustrations and maddening conflicts of contemporary American life without pulling their weapons and making threats.
The average concealed-carry permit holder realizes the inappropriateness of such behavior and truly reserves his or her weapon for life-threatening situations. And fortunately, even though life-threatening situations precipitated by assailants are all too common in our culture, the average concealed-carry permit holder never has occasion to pull their weapon in response to a threat.
They are armed against possible threats, even though such threats are statistically unlikely to face the average concealed-carry permit holder. All of which I believe is fine, the vast majority of the time.
I also believe that those who advocate for allowing guns on our campuses generally mean well. They truly believe -- mistakenly -- that such weapons will make us safer.
I disagree with them on that point, but I do acknowledge that they, like all of us, want our public places to be safe and free of violence. And while most concealed carry permit holders are responsible and law-abiding, it will only take a fraction of irresponsible owners for additional fatalities to rack up on our campuses.
There will be accidental discharges, suicides and gun-backed altercations that otherwise will not exist. There are two primary arguments for why guns should be allowed onto our campuses, both equally unconvincing.
Advocates for allowing students and faculty members with appropriate permits to carry guns on college campuses often argue that the presence of concealed weapons will deter acts of violence. Because the weapons are required by law to be kept concealed, the logic goes, would-be perpetrators of violence will think twice before initiating their violent plans, possibly abandoning them entirely.
They seem in many cases to anticipate taking their own lives or inflicting as much damage as possible until brought down by law enforcement, which leads to the second argument. Rather than entirely deterring an attack, the presence of concealed weapons seems likely to simply encourage an attacker to strategize further, finding scenarios where concealed weapons holders are likely to be absent or without their weapons.
The biggest hole in this argument is that permit holders of concealed weapons by and large are not trained for how to respond to active-shooter situations.
Certainly some concealed-weapons carriers have a military or law-enforcement background wherein they did receive such training, but they are a slim minority.
Concealed-carry classes do not train permit holders how to respond to hostile fire or active-shooter situations. Instead, such classes, which can be completed in a single day in most states, are concerned with educating students about the laws governing their concealed-carry permits, about basic gun safety principles and basic gun use.
In other words, the highly difficult active-shooter response training, which military and law-enforcement personnel spend dozens upon dozens of hours practicing in simulated environments, is simply not a part of concealed-permit class curricula.The Benefits of Concealed Carry of Firearms Essay Words 7 Pages The Benefits of Concealed Carry Did you know that the concealed carry of firearms has dropped the crime rates in every state across the United States in the states that enforce it.
Guns on campus would lead to an escalation in violent crime.
Guns on campus would lead to an increased number of suicides by college students. Guns on campus . Concealed Fireamrs on Campus Essay Words 5 Pages With backpacks in tow and pencils in hand, college students crisscross campus with stress of acing the test, hardly thinking about their safety.
Concealed Fireamrs on Campus Essay Words 5 Pages With backpacks in tow and pencils in hand, college students crisscross campus with stress of acing the test, hardly thinking about their safety.
Being able to carry a concealed gun has been a controversial topic for years. Many people are for being able to carry concealed weapons because it is a form of self-defense.
If someone carrying a concealed weapon is attacked, they will have something to fight back with. The spread of laws allowing guns on campus is a direct attack on faculty members' rights, writes Firmin DeBrabander. Essay: Movement to allow guns on campuses violates academic freedom Jump to Navigation.