If anything, the controversy has grown in both size and intensity. In the last decade, debates over how evolution should be taught in schools have been heard in school boards, town councils and legislatures in more than half the states. But beginning in the s, the U.
Important We believe any unbiased reader will realize that we were fair with our treatment of the two models in the table above. Yet, although the theory of evolution matches the facts in some cases, evolution is still an unproven theory. By now, you may believe it should be your first choice also.
Unlike many others that preceded us, we attempted to find a clear defense of evolution for two reasons: To keep from being accused of bias. To keep from making claims that someone could refute later. Even though there are a great number of claims in books and on the Internet, we could find no scientific, testable facts that support the theory of evolution.
The best site we could find was at The University of California at Berkeley. If you are interested, click here to examine the scientific evidence recorded at UC Berkeley yourself.
It includes lots of pictures, links to other pages, and scientific names. The site is very interesting and informative. Yet, we could not find a listing of the provable, testable facts supporting evolution anywhere.
Take some time and search the Internet yourself. If you find any hard scientific, testable evidence for evolution, please write us: Incidentally, this does not mean that we believe the work at Berkeley and other places does not have value.
On the contrary, we appreciate paleontologists, geologists, biologists, and all the other related scientists. Paraphrasing what we said at the beginning of this page, the reason many people will not change their point of view is because: They do not want to take the time to learn the truth. Reasoning used for the Comparison of Creation and Evolution to the Facts Scientists have ways to measure the universe and therefore its age.
This is an interesting topic and we constructed a separate page to address it. Click here to learn how astronomers measure the universe and its age.
Scientists have found a large number of fossils. Yes, there are many fossils lying around. That means a lot of plants and animals died and we can find their fossilized remains.
Someone who believes in evolution would have you believe this happened over time. Would they stay put and untouched on the ground long enough to be covered by dirt eventually and become fossilized? They would be eaten by other animals and blown around by the winds and rains until a complete skeleton was no longer available.
The reality is that there is no evidence that fossils were formed continually or are being formed continually as the theory of evolution predicts. On the other hand, what would happen if there were a worldwide flood, causing everything to drown, including the rat and the deer?
They might float for awhile, but would eventually sink to the bottom of the water. There is no question that the large number of fossils testifies to the accuracy of the creation model rather than the theory of evolution model.
The point of discussion here is whether the layers were deposited over vast geological times or over a relatively quick period.
Steve Austin investigated the Mount St. Helens eruption, which produced a small scale version of the Grand Canyon. He showed that thousands of layers were deposited over a number of days rather than being laid down gradually over long 4.
We are stating that ample evidence exists that the layers of the earth could be produced quickly by a geologic catastrophe like the flood in the Bible. It includes spectacular shots taken before, during, and after the eruption of Mount St. What the theory of evolution says We are told that old fossils are found in old rock layers and recent fossils are found in recent rock layers.
Yet, some fossils like clams are found in all strata, including rock layers at mountain tops. So, learning which clam was millions of years old and which one is only a few thousand years old becomes a little tricky. Notice that although the layers of the earth were dated using index fossils, the index fossils were dated by guessing their age based on the theory of evolution.
This is not science nor a valid application of the scientific method.Darwin's Theory Of Evolution. Darwin's Theory of Evolution - The Premise Darwin's Theory of Evolution is the widely held notion that all life is related and has descended from a common ancestor: the birds and the bananas, the fishes and the flowers -- all related.
Question: "What does the Bible say about creation vs.
evolution?" Answer: It is not the purpose of this answer to present a scientific argument in the creation vs. evolution debate. The purpose of this article is to explain why, according to the Bible, the creation vs. evolution debate even exists in its present form.
Scientific Facts Proving Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution is Wrong, False, and Impossible. News You Can Use. Hi, my name is Evolutionary Fraud from Piltdown, England. Many scientists and philosophers of science have described evolution as fact and theory, a phrase which was used as the title of an article by paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould in He describes fact in science as meaning data, not absolute certainty but "confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent".A scientific theory is a well-substantiated.
beleifs about origins of life, the Earth, and the rest of the universe, including theory of evolution and creation science. These free studies examine the teaching of the Bible about origins: the beginning of the universe, the earth, plants, animals, and man.
The Bible doctrine of creation is compared to evolution (organic evolution or theistic evolution).